The CB&Q (Chicago, Burlington and Quincy) Railroad Depot in downtown Sutton, just west of Saunders Avenue. |
The annual Clay County
Field Day was held in Clay Center in 1911 on a rainy Saturday just after the
end of the school year. More than 2300 spectators came to watch the day’s
athletic events. Fairfield and Sutton were especially well supported by a large
fan base. How did they all get to Clay Center that morning? Sutton fans
arranged for a special train from Sutton to Clay Center for the day. About half
of the Fairfield fans took the regular early morning passenger train to Clay
Center, the rest slept in and took the 10 o’clock train.
Also that spring, my
grandparents, Cecilia and Fred Johnson and Cecilia’s father, Adolph Aspegren
got on one of the east bound trains in Sutton and went to Chicago to visit
three of Cecilia’s brothers. Several days later Fred and Cecilia returned to
Sutton on a Burlington train. Adolph stayed a few more days before coming back to
Lincoln where his wife Emma met him for a day of shopping before returning to
Sutton that night.
A couple of years earlier,
Melchoir Figi left Sutton by train heading for Switzerland to visit his mother
for a few weeks.
One of our visitors to the
Sutton Museum told of riding the train from Sutton to Verona for her piano
lessons. The fare was a nickel each way.
Papers in the early 1900’s
frequently mentioned that local merchants left by train for St. Joseph, Kansas
City, Chicago or other destinations to purchase stock for their stores for the
upcoming season.
Farmers drove their cattle
to the rail side stock yards west of town, loaded the animals on a rail car,
climbed aboard and accompanied the cattle to Chicago for sale – “Hotel Beef”
they proudly advertised their product.
Weekly Burlington ads in
local newspapers told of vacation destinations in Seattle, Portland, San
Francisco and Los Angeles. Other adds touted eastern vacation spots.
Five trains a day, in each
direction on the main Burlington route, stopped in Sutton for much of the
developing years. The local route from McCool Junction to Fairfield was also
operated by Burlington for much of its existence but was called, wait for it …
“The Pook-Eye.” That would have been the track used in the Field Day story
above. A little help here please: (1) Why was it called that? (2) Did we really
call it that? And (3) is that the way you’d spell it too?
After reading these and
other newspaper accounts about travel by Sutton folks one hundred years ago, it
occurs to me that our grandparents and great-grandparents had more flexible
travel opportunities than we have today here in Sutton.
That seems like a radical
suggestion, but consider how we would replicate the Johnson – Aspegren trip to
Chicago. Three people en route to Chicago could easily drive the 500 miles each
way but they would probably have to all travel together both ways. Though I
very much enjoy driving, many people are not so fond of it and would definitely
prefer to sit back on a train.
We do have a train option today. Our three contemporary travelers could drive to Hastings any night and catch the 1:42 AM eastbound Amtrak train arriving in Chicago at 2:50 PM – not very flexible or convenient.
Most of us would probably
drive to the Lincoln Airport or Omaha’s Eppley Airfield and fly to either
O’Hare or Midway in Chicago. Again, our three contemporary travelers would
likely have to travel together getting to the airport and in Chicago.
So, our contention here is
that the 1911 rail system on the plains gave our Sutton ancestors a superior
choice in travel than we have today. Assuming for a moment that the contention
may be true we can ask if the situation is reparable; that is, could we regain
rail service as our ancestors enjoyed a century ago?
First, let’s return to the
Amtrak situation. We have a powerful economic ideology in this country that all
endeavors must be profit-making. We are selective in applying that ideology,
but Amtrak certainly gets hammered in this regard. There are repeated calls to
de-fund, close down or otherwise limit Amtrak as it requires “government
subsidies.” That call is strengthened by an unwillingness to consider broadly
defined cost accounting but we don’t have time/space to go there right now.
Suffice it to say, roads, bridges, air traffic controllers, airports,
maintenance, etc. need to be included in the equation. In any event, passenger
rail service will not likely support itself out here on the plains in the near
future.
If you’ll indulge a couple
of personal experiences, I’ll describe what rail travel can look like. After
I’d “enjoyed” eleven years of a typical thirty-mile California driving commute,
the public sector initiated the ACE (Altamont Commuter Express) train
paralleling my drive. (http://www.acerail.com) Talk about
subsidized! These $14 million trains were given to the system. The revenue from
fares was only expected to provide 50% of operating expenses – salaries, fuel,
track use fees, etc. Why would the government do such a thing? Answer: to preclude
(at least delay) having to build another eight lane road across a mountain
range (albeit, a small range, but still…). This was, and continues to be, a cost
effective transportation “system.” The more congested that I-580 became, the
more passengers rode the rails prompting additional trains. As they say, “Cheap
at half the price,” actually far less than half.
The other personal
experience comes from sixteen major and several minor train trips in Europe on
trains from the Eurostar, to Regional systems to metros. The European rail
infrastructure is a legitimate “Wonder of the World. European public transit
systems fully meet the needs of a high percentage of residents – owning a car
is less common than here and even for a car owner, the train is generally
faster, more convenient, comfortable and a whole lot cheaper.
A rail system much like
today’s European system seems to have been working well one hundred years ago
right here in Nebraska.
This article first appeared in Sutton Life Magazine in July, 2011. For more information about this local Sutton publication visit www.suttonlifemagazine.com of contact Jarod Griess at neighborhoodlife@yahoo.com or 402-773-4203.
This article first appeared in Sutton Life Magazine in July, 2011. For more information about this local Sutton publication visit www.suttonlifemagazine.com of contact Jarod Griess at neighborhoodlife@yahoo.com or 402-773-4203.
No comments:
Post a Comment